Links For Web Pub III In-Class Exercise 3:
Return to Main Web Site Report Page
Annotated Links:
http://www.southwest.com/
Southwest.com is an example of a web site with a well structured hierarchy. The site is very easy to use and is one of my favorite travel sites. The first thing your eye sees in the top left is the thing that most people go there for: Reservations. That is followed by: Schedules, Fares, Click N Save, Travel Center and Rapid Rewards. These all seem to be in the right order in terms of importance. Below the main navigation buttons are some links of secondary importance, like E-mail update, SWA Biz, Careers, etc. Their placement and size is appropriate for their content. There is also a section on the bottom half of the page for What's New, where the airline highlights it's hot current items. Navigating through the site to purchase a ticket is very easy. The flight schedules and fare options are laid out well and you have your ticket within four clicks. This site passes with flying colors.
One of my favorite websites is dialpad.com.
When I first discovered this website, I could not believe how easy it was to
use. The registration process took very little time. The links explained how
dialpad works very precisely with easy to understand instructions and
illustrations. The homepage contains a member login form, and 4 links. The
four links include, what is dialpad, how dialpad works, dialpad contact
information, jobs. This simple structure is all that is needed.
http://www.walgreens.com/library/default.jhtml
A+ for well structured hierarchy -- you can tell what makes Walgreens tick.
Beginning with the tabs at the top - first pharmacy, then health library, then
corporate information - clearly shows that most important is the pharmacy,
next is providing information to consumers and visitors, and third is company
information for those interested or seeking. On the pharmacy page, the
hierarchy is again well done -- prescriptions - Online Pharmacy, Refills, and
then more about Walgreens pharmacy and related services (Learn More) --
obvious & easy to find, these links are part of an obvious and well
thought out hierarchy.
http://www.sourgrapes.com/home/home.html
"Sour Grapes" is a black comedy about how money can't buy health and
happiness. It's directed by Larry David, the co-creator of "Seinfeld"!
This web site provides the user with clearly defined left-to-right hierarchy
in its navigation. It has a vine with grapes that burst each time the
mouse rolls over them. This navigation menu is available to the user on every
page of the web site. Their main links are 'Story', 'Actors', 'Director',
'Downloads' and 'Test your Ethics Quotient'. Each of these links has
sub-categories under them. For instance, under the 'actors' link, there is a
list of actors that were a part of this production; under the 'downloads'
link, there is a list of scenes the user can download. Over all this website
has a clear and concise hierarchy through which the user CAN NOT get lost!
SEE U THERE
See You There relaxes your eye with the white space around their mission
statement. Then they offer to take you on a tour of event planning. This
allows the person to be quickly introduced to the subject matter. Then upon
exiting you return to the homepage to search further and the top navigation
bar is clean with only 6 choices.
Aim: Visit Quantum Design's website for information on their
products (magnetometers)
Audience: Almost entirely scientists from universities and national
labs
First impression Loaded quickly using a 56K modem. Site was simple,
pleasing, no graphics. Home page got straight to the subject
Hierarchy: links to other pages were on the sidebar on the left.
Home page described what kind of products they make. One immediately knows
whether to go in or move on to another site. The next button is to
"OVERVIEW" which is a brief overview of the company, products, and
the market. Next is "PRODUCTS" which describes the product lines.
The sublevel here has the individual products with all the specs, photos and
even info to download. This is roughly where people will get all their info
and leave.
Other button on the menu bar are for technical docs, contact, etc. which is
rightly towards the bottom! You don't buy a million dollar piece of equipment
without looking around some more!
to Quantum Design
Well Structured Hierarchy: Chrysler
Motors
Interesting how I'm so not a fan of Chrysler vehicles,
but I dig the naming and hierarchy of their web site. For pretty much the
same reasons that I previously discussed about this site being reminiscent of a MS Windows Explorer, I think this
implementation provides a simple and easy way to structure a lot of web
pages, files and information in general. The frame at left always shows one
where they are in the hierarchy relative to the home page and content
sections of other pages. One of the text links in the navigation section
listed as 'Products' opens a target page in the content frame with another
set of text links for deeper site searching. I found this to be a nice
example of how this site does not overuse the navigation section. Because
it's set to a fixed width, there is certainly a limit to how many child
layers can be opened in the navigation hierarchy before it looks out of
control. Overall, the navigation structure of this site is a winner to me.
www.squaw.com A very well organized
and well structured site. There is no way one could be mistaken as to where
the user is being led once you start checking out the links. The site
distinctly divides information for their summer and winter activities. All
information are current and the site is obviously updated all the time.
The site's hierarchy goes down to only up to two sublevel from the main level
which makes it less boring for users to get access information.
http://www.redlandbaptist.org/
This site's navigation is excellent and a pleasure to navigate, especially
given it is for a non-profit organization. The site has clean and clear
direction and structure, with a limited number of links. The navigation is not
top-heavy, with a primary navigation bar on the center right (text JavaScript
rollovers), and secondary navigation at the bottom (text) and top right (text
box form). This navigation carries through from page to page (however, the
primary navigation bar is on the left). This primary navigation bar is
hierarchical (five levels) and rebuilds upon accessing each page - most
impressive! The site places the most important links first, from top to bottom
and left to right, with the exception of the homepage, which acts as a
quasi-splash page to reinforce the brand. Also, the contacts link and search
text box is at the end or bottom of the navigation bars. Use of text and
graphic links makes it more difficult to update but adds to the navigation of
the site. The site offers multiple navigation approaches (text and graphics,
with "onmouseover" and "onmouseout" and "alt"
tags), good text links (brief and intuitive names, which are all in lower case
without spaces) and a homepage icon ("RedlandBaptist.Org" logo).
Also, they even have a powerful search engine on their site, which is
effective and superb - wow!
A site that is a well structured hierarchy is SDSU.edu
SDSU also has a well structured hierarchy. The most important information is
first and on top. For example, the link to the students is on the top
navigation bar listed immediately after the home page. Then the faculty,
prospective students, alumni, and news are listed respectively.
A site that was easy to follow through as well keep track of where you are
is yahoo.com. Not just as a search engine,
but in regards to information you can drill down into within the site, you are
given the trail at the top of the page and are always made aware of where you
are. You can also click on any of those areas to go back or skip back a couple
of pages.
The Napa Valley Wine Train has a
really nice web page. The navigation is clear and the hierarchy is good. I had
no problem finding the information I needed to make reservation my
reservations on the Napa Valley Wine Train. The navigation buttons are in the
following order: General information, train schedules, rates, and sample menu,
what more could you want. I would like to use some of these very simple ideas
on my site.
The Apple site, http://www.apple.com/ is a
good example of a well structured hierarchy because it's organized and clear.
Apple clearly identified their products, services, and company information. If
I was interested in a G4, I can find it easily within a click under hardware.
Here is another good site for structure; Tucows.
Tucows is a site offering software/shareware/freeware to the general
population. There main page offers the user the ability to browse software by
type of product or by the operation system. This is another site that I've
never been "lost" in.
http://www.kurtross.com/
This site is a fine art photography site. It is broken down into two well
laid out columns. The left-most column lists where the pictures were taken,
geographically by region (the southwest, the Adirondacks, etc.). The
right-most column gives information on how to purchase the art, the artist's
biography, a show schedule, contact information, etc. When the links to the
artwork are followed, a thumbnail sketch of the photograph is displayed, along
with information on the image--size, how to purchase it, where it was taken,
etc. All other links are what you would expect them to be too. I like
the way this site is laid out. It is well structured and actually quite a
beautiful site. It is both a showcase for the artwork, as well as a practical
way to obtain further information about the art, or to buy it. This was
probably the best site I visited
Ciao Tours
Ciao Tours specialize in Tuscany and their links are basically the list of
everything, one would possibly like to do during his or hers Tuscan holidays.
They have their own icons on the home page:
[Golf | Gardens | Terme | Riding | Wine | Strolling | Hiking | Cooking |
Fantasy ]
In the bottom of the page above links are repeated and another are added that
I would call service links, they are:
[ Hints | Customize | Insurance | Home | Contact | Email ]
This hierarchy is really clear and easy to navigate.
[ return to top ]
Annotated Links:
And finally, here is a website with a poorly structured hierarchy. Diesel.com
is an e-commerce site. The demographic for this website is 18-30 years old.
The homepage is laid out like a "mock" tabloid newspaper. The front
page of this paper is an imagemap which takes viewers to another page in the
site. On the right hand side are links which also take viewers to various
locations within the website. Many of the images link to other popups. The
concept for this page is not bad but I found it hard to figure out what was
the main feature of this company. It seemed to only feature malnourished
people preening around. This company also manufactures accessories which were
barely featured on the website.
http://www.pepsico.com/
I love Pepsi, but am not wild about its site. Where's the hierarchy? The links
are so small! Okay, there in the top left hand corner -- good job -- but there
so small! And all of equal size. I wish the page contained a visual clue about
what to visit first - everything is displayed too equally!
http://www.intel.com/
Intel, one of the biggest firms in technology did a below average job at
creating a structured hierarchy in their navigation menu. They have both
left-to-right and top-to-bottom menus. The left-to-right menu consists
of 'Intel.com', 'Contents', 'Search', 'Contact Us' and 'Support'. The
top-to-bottom menu has 'Home Computing', 'Business', 'Developer', 'Channel',
'Products & Services', 'Company Info' and 'Pentium III owners'. What can
confuse the user the most is the marginal difference between 'contact us', 'Intel.com',
and 'company info.' May be all of these could have been a part of the same
category called 'Our Company'. In addition, 'Pentium III owners' should have
been a sub-heading under 'Products & Services' or 'Home Computing'.
'Channel' and 'Developer' links have no meaning by themselves to the user.
This navigation hierarchy is not only misleading but also inaccurately
designed.
TENNIS.COM
Tennis.com is a site that throws a little bit of this and a little bit of that
into the pile just to see if they can fit it all on. Oh, they can't. So they
use scrolling navigation bars that are really annoying and takes up so much
valuable space for even more annoying advertising. There is no pitch, no
direction no inspiration at all. Even the names on the links are confusing. I
get tired just thinking about tooling around in search of the perfect tennis
racket.
Aim: Visit Humirel's website for information about humidity sensors
(including what temperature range do they work in? what kind of power supply
do they need?---)
Audience: mostly technical people doing experimental work
First impression first page has a picture but doesn't say much.
Appearance is plain.
Hierarchy: links to other pages were on the sidebar-frames!
Home page said nothing except for the menu bar. The next button on the side
bar is COMPANY PROFILE with unnecessary info on the company. Next comes
CONTACT US and GET SAMPLES (which are just forms to fill out) even before they
describe their products. Finally we get to PRODUCT INFO but here all they do
is ask you to download info. We do not find a description of their products
anywhere on the pages. There is little motivation to stay and look around.
to Humirel.com
A Poorly Structured Hierarchy: Starbucks
I'd consider the Achilles heel of this site to be it's
absence of a site map which I think should be a standard component for any
and every web site. Even if a site has a poorly implemented hierarchy, a
site map can at least enable a user to find their way around. That's not to
say that a site map is a cure for an incoherent structure of pages claiming
to be a web site, but it can at least be a fall back for the masses to use
for navigation. I consider a site map it to be the universal tool/compass
(GPS for the modern folk) to be used when a person is lost. Starbucks
has incorporated an eclectic mix of products into their business, certainly
some that do not have much to do with coffee. Altogether, the categories of
products that they market are in fact fairly heterogeneous. The mix of
subject matter certainly can make for a successful business venture, but it
presents a definite challenge to have a coherent system that understandably
puts it all together in a navigable web site. The thought I'm left with
after surfing this site is, it's simply unorganized, but this does not imply
a negative critique about the web site. Surfing it is very semblant to an
experience visiting a Starbucks store. You go in, buy your coffee, and while
you're waiting for it to be prepared, you're exposed to all this stuff. It
reminds me of being at a garage sale, there's all kinds of trinkets and
random items to buy. Altogether, it creates what I'll call the
Starbucks atmosphere which to me certainly adds to some of it's attraction,
and it all seems purposeful. Interesting, that if I were to rate this site
artistically, it would be among my favorites. I like the backgrounds and
fonts that are used.
www.skiheavenly.com As
competitor to Squaw Valley, Heavenly Ski Resort failed to even come close to
offering a site that is navigational. It is littered with graphics that are
not necessary, links that are hard to follow or even understand and menus all
over the place. I recently accessed it to find out about season passes
for the next ski season and found out that most of the information on the site
are not updated. There are also links that do not seem to serve any purposes.
When looking for the season pass link, I used that pull down site index menu
and found the link on Tickets and Passes. Once on that page, it is not
immediately clear where the information is because the only one that one
notices right away is a paragraph informing the user about the availability of
such passes. Upon further scrutiny, one might notice that the link for the
passes are in small clickable text under the heading.
A site that has a poorly structured hierarchy is Iwon.com
Iwon.com is not structured very well. I don't know what is the most important
information. There is also a lot of information on the homepage. It is very
similar to Yahoo.com. On Yahoo's site, I also do not know what is the most
important information.
There are some sites that you use quite often due to their
content and often forget or ignore if they are structurally any good. tonystone.com
is one of those sites. I use this site pretty often, but it was hard to first
figure it out. I mainly use the search feature and don't bother really
utilizing the other areas.
Citibank a well known
name in quality banking? Well you should see their site. It is a really good
example of WHY NOT to use Frames. I tried to get information of their on-line
banking, and what a wild goose hunt. I had so many windows opened and none of
them buttons took me where they promise. I left the site with no information.
To obtain information on a PC300GL, I got frustrated answering questions on
'series' and 'models'. I shouldn't have to remember the series or models of a
PC if I don't have a clue about it. IBM, www.ibm.com,
also known as the e-commerce solution is packed with information that it took
me approximately six clicks to get there.
Shakespeare's
Italy
The best worst example I have found in this category is the site of Joe
Vincent. Below I have copied names of his links in original order:
Our Philosophy, Photogallery, Web Links, Future Tours, Meet the Tour Guide,
Itinerary, Home, Accomodations, Payment and Disclaimer, Contact us
One think I really dislike is to start from philosophy when I'm going to
holidays. I am always most interested in what tours they offer, here it is not
easy to find. After a while I decided to go to Future Tours and... Bingo! Web
links in the beginning is really not the best idea, accommodations after home
and before payments... Anyway this is how one usually explore site with poor
hierarchy.
http://www.opsd.com/
The Office Pavillion page has no links. This multi-million dollar
company fit everything into one page. Some may consider this good
organization, but I feel they didn't strive to create a useful site.
[ return to top ]
|